Carrollton School (Neg)
Round 3
Vs. Kansas City Central
Judge: Dan Lewis
1NC:
T – Framework (Normative defense of USFG action)
-not individuals
-in Washington
-Expectation of action
-PHA is prevention or treatment
B. Aff doesnot endorse USFG action
Limits – topic is huge
Predictability – USFG is most qualified; we’re not ready to debate if we don’t know what the aff will say
Extra Topicality – we have to win fframework to get back to equal footing
Topic Education
Instrumentality is a VI – Shively 2k (terms of debate key)
CP – advocate re-writing history; excludes PHA
As the negative team, we advocate heeding perspectives and rewriting history to include afrocentric knowledge and histories
NB:
Western aid is inevitably bad and excludes the other
Rhetoric of PHA is bad and fails to escape the development paradigm
China DA:
China is using PHA to defeat America in political battles for African footholds
Chau 2007 “political warfare in Sub Saharan Africa”
this means plan would be miscalculated as attempt at us containment
Shirk 2007, China fragile superpower
Perception of containment also causes Chinese invasion of Taiwan
Marquardt 2003 “China’s distant threat to US dominance in Asia”
Etinction – Straits Times 2K
Case:
Their alt fails to ground itself pragmatically because it has no clear course of action, discourses are ironed out and the are co-opted
Intellectual rsistance destroys the possibility for actual action/resistance
The advocacy of policy options is good for critical thinking
Role playing debate is good for real world activism – Joyner 99
2NC: CP w/ PH Bad, DA; characterizes voting neg as allowing China to give aid to Africa (the squo); Chinese aid is better and helps Africans more than the aff does
1NR: T and Case
2NR: T-Framework, CP (including severence bad), China, Case
Round 3
Vs. Kansas City Central
Judge: Dan Lewis
1NC:
T – Framework (Normative defense of USFG action)
-not individuals
-in Washington
-Expectation of action
-PHA is prevention or treatment
B. Aff doesnot endorse USFG action
Limits – topic is huge
Predictability – USFG is most qualified; we’re not ready to debate if we don’t know what the aff will say
Extra Topicality – we have to win fframework to get back to equal footing
Topic Education
Instrumentality is a VI – Shively 2k (terms of debate key)
CP – advocate re-writing history; excludes PHA
As the negative team, we advocate heeding perspectives and rewriting history to include afrocentric knowledge and histories
NB:
Western aid is inevitably bad and excludes the other
Rhetoric of PHA is bad and fails to escape the development paradigm
China DA:
China is using PHA to defeat America in political battles for African footholds
Chau 2007 “political warfare in Sub Saharan Africa”
this means plan would be miscalculated as attempt at us containment
Shirk 2007, China fragile superpower
Perception of containment also causes Chinese invasion of Taiwan
Marquardt 2003 “China’s distant threat to US dominance in Asia”
Etinction – Straits Times 2K
Case:
Their alt fails to ground itself pragmatically because it has no clear course of action, discourses are ironed out and the are co-opted
Intellectual rsistance destroys the possibility for actual action/resistance
The advocacy of policy options is good for critical thinking
Role playing debate is good for real world activism – Joyner 99
2NC: CP w/ PH Bad, DA; characterizes voting neg as allowing China to give aid to Africa (the squo); Chinese aid is better and helps Africans more than the aff does
1NR: T and Case
2NR: T-Framework, CP (including severence bad), China, Case