Violation- aff vaguely describes object of their plan by saying “resolutionally defined areas”
Vote neg- they can spike out a DA based on specific countries and country PICS- losing ground
ASPEC
intrep – aff must specify what branch of gov. they use- they don’t
vote neg-
ground and education
aff conditionality
BurmaDA
RussiaDA
Violence K
Understanding violence as something that happens “out there” and is perpetrated by heads of state or armies is 1st step to forgetting our own responsibility for violence in world questions about what government should do erase questions about we should and ensure violence continues while we wallow in our own powerlessness Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“we are the war…..war and violence”
Attempts to explain violence in abstract and formulaic terms shield individuals from any responsibility for their actions. Describing violence as inevitable result of chain of events washes hands of those who commit violence Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“Scientific discourse to…… set of causes.”
Aff explanation of violence can never produce positive change- understanding violence guarantees complicity with violent world orderings Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“Violence- what we recognize as such…. permit them to happen”
Their representations of the diseased victim create a self-fufilling prophecy. The so-called victims become powerless in the face of structural somination Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“Ther cannot therefore…account of oppression”
Violence can never constitute effective act of resistance to violence. Acts of violence make us complicit with violence
Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“Resistance to violence….use violence ourselves”
Alt: begin interrogation of violence with a local refusal to endorse violence of ass – should become peace by refusing the aff Only way to understand our complicity. Politicizes the way we think Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“If we nevertheless continue to explain…and for a non-violent society”
Kritik is prerequisite to types of interrogations initiated by aff- seeking out ways we are connected to violence Nayar 99- {Jayan, Law Student@ U of Warlwick Re-Framing International Law for 21st Century: Orders of Inhumanity Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 599]
“The description of the continuities…necessary to consider the ‘technologies’ of ordering”
2NR went for Violence Kritik
1NC OFF-CASE OUTLINE
Vagueness – Don’t say SSA
Violation- aff vaguely describes object of their plan by saying “resolutionally defined areas”
Vote neg- they can spike out a DA based on specific countries and country PICS- losing ground
ASPEC
intrep – aff must specify what branch of gov. they use- they don’t
vote neg-
ground and education
aff conditionality
Burma DA
Russia DA
Violence K
Understanding violence as something that happens “out there” and is perpetrated by heads of state or armies is 1st step to forgetting our own responsibility for violence in world questions about what government should do erase questions about we should and ensure violence continues while we wallow in our own powerlessness
Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“we are the war…..war and violence”
Attempts to explain violence in abstract and formulaic terms shield individuals from any responsibility for their actions. Describing violence as inevitable result of chain of events washes hands of those who commit violence
Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“Scientific discourse to…… set of causes.”
Aff explanation of violence can never produce positive change- understanding violence guarantees complicity with violent world orderings
Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“Violence- what we recognize as such…. permit them to happen”
Their representations of the diseased victim create a self-fufilling prophecy. The so-called victims become powerless in the face of structural somination
Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“Ther cannot therefore…account of oppression”
Violence can never constitute effective act of resistance to violence. Acts of violence make us complicit with violence
Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“Resistance to violence….use violence ourselves”
Alt: begin interrogation of violence with a local refusal to endorse violence of ass – should become peace by refusing the aff
Only way to understand our complicity. Politicizes the way we think
Kappler 95[Susanne- associate prof @Al-Akhawayn U, “The Will ro Violence: The Politics of Personal Behavior 95, pg 10-11]
“If we nevertheless continue to explain…and for a non-violent society”
Kritik is prerequisite to types of interrogations initiated by aff- seeking out ways we are connected to violence
Nayar 99- {Jayan, Law Student@ U of Warlwick Re-Framing International Law for 21st Century: Orders of Inhumanity Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 599]
“The description of the continuities…necessary to consider the ‘technologies’ of ordering”