Neg v. WP

T
LOST good
EU CP
AT: Disease adv
AT: Heg adv


Round # 1

Vs Team: Newburgh Free

Judge: Brian Manuel


Case Args:

Consequentialism Good
Nuke war outweighs structural violence

De-mining doesn’t solve
Long timeframe

Off Case Args:

Cap Bad K
Proximal Risk T
EU CP
LOST Good DA


Block Strategy:
Politics
EU CP
Framework

2NC biodiversity impact:

LOST accession vital to protect oceanic biodiversity
Brent Wagner and Philip Lofrumento 99
The Washington Quartery
Summer, Lexis

“Last but not least, the treaty will revolutionize environmental stewardship...American and international environmental groups.”


Extinction Robin Kendis Craig 03, Lexis



2nr Strategy:


Cites:

LOST impact

Failure to ratify LOST means the US has to use force to control the arctic

WSJ 8-22-07, “US resistance to sea treaty thaws”

“all this has put the U.S. in a jam....found in all the world’s fossil fuels.”



And, Failure to ratify makes US-Russiabn conflict and miscalc inevitable over sea be recourses

The Stattesman Journal (OR) 9-10-07
U.S. Should sign sea treaty to stake claim in the Arctic”
“The hypothetical Northwest Passage via the Arctic Ocean...Oil spills there are harder to clean up.”


Miscalc causes nuke war
Arnold Kanter et al 9-13-99
“A Deal with Russia on Arms control”, boston globe

“Second, we want to do what we can do...that our children will pay the price”

Round 4

Vs. Bishop Guertin

Judge: Sara Sanchez


1NC: 3 on, 3 off

1. ASPEC

2. LOST Politics – Same as other neg rounds (round 1?)

3. CP: EU should establish a global health service to expand the capacity of community health workers to the same countries targeted in the President’s emergency Plan for AIDS relief focus countries in the area designated by the resolution

Promoting EU health assistance is vital to effective EU foreign poliy – this is key to global environmental rotection, terror and disease prevention
Owen 6(“Health and Conflict Prevention,”, ed: Andrew Melbourn, www.madariaga.org/download2.asp?file=Anna%20lindh%202006.pdf)
there is a need for integrated thinking….modern foreign policy”

The plan will collapse EU foreign policy – anti Americanism and foregn assistance are the glue that holds the EU together nd the plan destroys the EU as an effective global model
Melvin 5(“The United States of Europe”, lexis)
Europe, with its emphasis…foreign policy" he said.

The EU model of governance is vital to forming transnational linkages between states – this deemphasizes the need for military force as a solution to conflict
Rifkin 4 (The Utne Reader, “The European Dream”, itssd.org)
while the American spirit languishes…welfare of the planet

Enhancing transnationalism will transform global political divisions and prevents global nuke war
Seita 97 (30 Cornell Int’l L. J. 429, lexis)
Because globalization promotes common values across nations….perhaps eliminate completely the risk of nuclear war

EU SoPo is vital to Balkan Stability
Bildt 2005 (Carl, Financial Times, 6/1, Europe must keep its soft power”, www.cer.org.uk)
Yet, in recent years, Europe has prided…power of the EU has caused

Balkan instability spreads tgroughout Europe – impact is WWIII
Paris 2 (Political Science Quarterly, “Kosovo and the metaphor war”, Vol 117, Issue 3, Fall, Proquest)
At this early stage in the Kosovo crisis…Balkan powderkeg, before it is too late

This causes nuclear escalation
Glaser 93 (International Security, Summer, Ebsco)
The ending of the cold war has brought many benefits…attacks against the American homeland

4. Disease

Won’t cause extinction – emp. prove – analytic

They don’t solve spillover – only in Africa

5. Terror

Terrorism in Africa is not a threat to the US

They wont use WMD

No risk of lashout


6. Soft Power

Hegemonic temptation –
A. MAKES MILITARY AGGRESSION INEVITABLE
LAYNE 6 (THE PEACE OF ILLUSIONS: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present , pp. 152-3)
There is another road to US oversxtension…more than they can chew

B. Policymakers will exaggerate threats to justify hegemony
Layne 6 (Same as above, p 185-6)
Proponents of offshore balancing…too many times in the past

C. This creates self-fulfilling prophecies and perpetual wars, causing extinction
Valunzuela 6 (“Perpetual War, Perpetual Terror”, informationclearinghouse.info)
Today the Us is responsible for 40%...we fear most, a terrorist state.

Multipolarity is inevitable
Lyne 6 (Same as above, page 149)
Although balance-of-power theorists…multipolar between now and 2020

Hegemony fuels terrorism
Layne 6 (page 189-90)
the events of 9/11 are another example….a lightning rod for muslim anger

Extinction – Alexander 3

Us hegemony on balance generates greate instability than retreat
Kolko 6 (The Age of War: The United States confronts the world, page 173-8, Gabriel)
the obsession with power and the conviction that armies…only produced endless misery and upheavals of every kind

Hegemony is unsustainable – multiple economic costs
Layne 6 (“Impotent Power? Re-examining the nature of America’s hegemonic Power”, the national interest, ebsco)
The real issue is not if American primacy will end…no longer could afford to maintain its primacy

Delaying the transition makes the economic costs worse – collapses the economy
Layne 6 (Ebsco Article, form above)
During the past 15 years or so since the Soviet Union…economic base upon which it rests

Mead 92