Groves Round 4


GROVES --- NEG
1nc
T – public health must be prevention of disease not treating symptoms of it
LOST Good DA [generic African aid costs pc link]
China DA
Framework – must defend a T plan with policy impacts no out of round discursive impacts
Denmark do the plan + US do community threatre in Latin America CP
Case: Util/consequentialism good, threat con creates value to life, plan doesn’t spillover, community theatre cant solve stigma
Block
Extends everything except T and Framework

Grove Neg

Round # 2

Vs Team: Colleyville Heritage

Judge: Whit Whitmore


Case Args:


Alt caustality for climate change and aids epidemic
Failes to solve hunger, not sustainable ag
Food security increasing
Africa will reject biotech
Lack of research kills biotech

Water doesn’t lead to war
Water claims are exaggerated, resolved diplomatically
Water conflict is subsumed by middle-east

China wont war with US
China break patent laws already
US key not china to econ
Global economy resilient
African backlash makes china inev
China econ failing

Off Case Args:


T- increase is lagers, $ = aid, patents aren’t property cant be givin
Pharma DA à econ
Law of the Sea (good) à pc link à marine environment
Litigation counterplan
The National Association of Attorneys General Regulatory association
Mutually exclusive, no ptx


Block Strategy:

T—remove barrier, not increase money, best topic not smallest, context ev is dumb
LOST
CP
CASE

2nr Strategy:

LOST
CP